If these FAQs usually do not deal with your questions that are particular please contact us.
Modular houses. Is a home that is modular manufactured house for purposes of Regulation C?
Response: For Regulation C reporting, a manufactured house is just the one that fits the HUD rule, 12 CFR 203.2(i). The formal staff commentary shows that modular domiciles which can be prepared for occupancy if they leave the factory and satisfy most of the HUD rule requirements are within the concept of „manufactured house“. 203.2(i)-1. The remark, and a previous FAQ on this web site, have actually raised questions regarding whether a modular house should always be reported as a manufactured home or as a single- to dwelling that is four-family. Before the Board provides further guidance regarding modular domiciles, loan providers may, at their option, report a modular house as either a single- to four-family dwelling or as being a manufactured home.
This FAQ supersedes the FAQ that is prior modular houses published in December 2003.
Conditional approvals—customary loan-commitment or loan-closing conditions. The commentary shows that an organization states a „denial“ if an organization approves that loan susceptible to underwriting conditions (apart from customary loan-commitment or loan-closing conditions) together with applicant will not meet them. See remark 4(a)(8)-4. Exactly what are customary loan-commitment or loan-closing conditions?
Answer: Customary loan-commitment or loan-closing conditions consist of clear-title needs, appropriate property study, appropriate name insurance binder, clear termite examination, and, in which the applicant intends to utilize the arises from the purchase of just one house to buy another, funds declaration showing sufficient arises from the purchase. See feedback 2(b)-3 and 4(a)(8)-4. A job candidate’s failure to meet up with those types of conditions, or a condition that is analogous causes the applying to be coded „approved although not accepted. “ Customary loan-commitment and loan-closing conditions usually do not consist of (1) problems that constitute a counter-offer, such as for instance a need for a greater down-payment; (2) underwriting conditions in regards to the debtor’s creditworthiness, including satisfactory debt-to-income and loan-to-value ratios; or (3) verification or confirmation, in whatever type the financial institution ordinarily calls for, that the debtor satisfies underwriting conditions borrower creditworthiness that is concerning.
Conditional approvals—failure to meet creditworthiness conditions. Just exactly exactly How should a loan provider rule „action taken“ where in fact the borrower will not satisfy conditions concerning creditworthiness?
Response: in cases where a credit choice is not made therefore the debtor has expressly withdrawn, make use of the rule for „application withdrawn. “ That code just isn’t otherwise available. See Appendix The, I.B.1.d. The lender has to produce a credit choice together with applicant has not yet taken care of immediately a demand when it comes to extra information when you look at the time permitted, use the rule for „file closed for incompleteness. In the event that condition involves publishing more information about creditworthiness“ See Appendix the, I.B.1.e. If the debtor has provided cash central review the knowledge the lending company calls for for a credit choice while the loan provider denies the application form or runs a counter-offer that the debtor doesn’t accept, utilize the rule for „application denied. “ Then make use of the rule for „application authorized although not accepted. In the event that debtor has satisfied the underwriting conditions for the loan provider plus the loan provider agrees to give credit however the loan isn’t consummated, „
As an example, if approval is trained on an effective assessment and, despite notice for the significance of an assessment, the applicant decreases to get an assessment or doesn’t react to the lending company’s notice, then application is coded „file closed for incompleteness. “ Then the financial institution must make use of the rule for „application rejected. If, having said that, the applicant obtains an appraisal nevertheless the assessment will not offer the thought loan-to-value ratio while the loan provider is therefore maybe not ready to extend the loan amount looked for, “
Refinancing — coverage vs. Reporting. Why exist two definitions of „refinancing, “ one for „coverage“ plus one for „reporting“?
Response: a loan provider makes use of the definition that is reporting 203.2(k)(2), to ascertain whether or not to report a certain application, origination, or purchase being a „refinancing“ into the loan function industry; a loan provider utilizes the protection definition, 203.2(k)(1), to ascertain perhaps the organization has enough house purchase loan task, including refinancings of house purchase loans, when it comes to organization become included in HMDA. See 203.2(e)(1)(iii), 203.2(e)(2)(i) and (iii). The coverage meaning is certainly not strongly related determining whether or not to report a specific transaction as being a refinancing.
Refinancing — loan purpose. If an obligation satisfies and replaces another obligation, may be the reason for the changed responsibility strongly related whether or not the obligation that is new a reportable „refinancing“ under Regulation C?
Answer: No. The latest concept of a reportable refinancing appears simply to whether (1) an obligation satisfies and replaces another responsibility and (2) each obligation is guaranteed by way of a dwelling. See 203.2(k)(2). Therefore, as an example, a satisfaction and replacement of that loan created for a company purpose is really a reportable refinancing if both the newest loan while the replaced loan are guaranteed by a dwelling.
Refinancing — line of credit. In case a dwelling-secured type of credit satisfies and replaces another dwelling-secured obligation, could be the line needed to be reported as being a „refinancing“?
Answer: No. A dwelling-secured personal credit line that satisfies and replaces another dwelling-secured responsibility is not necessary to be reported being a „refinancing, “ no matter whether the line is actually for customer or company purposes.
Refinancing — guaranty secured by dwelling. If a responsibility guaranteed by way of a dwelling is pleased and changed by an responsibility by which a guaranty regarding the credit responsibility is guaranteed by way of a dwelling however the brand new credit responsibility is maybe maybe not guaranteed by a dwelling, may be the transaction reportable under HMDA?
Response: No, a transaction just isn’t reportable being home purchase loan or refinancing unless the credit responsibility, it self, is guaranteed by way of a dwelling. See h that is 203.2(, 203.2(k)(2). A responsibility maybe perhaps perhaps not guaranteed by way of a dwelling is reportable being a true home improvement loan as long as categorized because of the loan provider as a property improvement loan. See 203.2(g)(2).
Refinancing — satisfaction of lien. Could be the satisfaction of the lien (mortgage) highly relevant to determining whether an responsibility is really a reportable refinancing?
Response: No, the satisfaction of the lien is neither necessary nor adequate to generate a refinancing that is reportable. The credit responsibility should be pleased and changed; it is really not relevant if the lien is pleased and changed. See 203.2(k)(2)
Refinancing — money down for do it yourself. Just exactly How should a lender rule a loan that is dwelling-secured the debtor makes use of the funds both to pay off a preexisting dwelling-secured loan and also to help with a dwelling?
Solution: A dwelling-secured loan that fulfills the definitions of both „home enhancement loan“ and „refinancing“ ought to be coded as a „home enhancement loan. „See comment 203.2(g)-5. The lending company must code the mortgage as being a „home enhancement loan“ even when the loan provider will not classify it when you look at the loan provider’s own documents being a „home enhancement loan. “ See 203.2(g)(1).
MECAs. Should MECAs (Modification, Extension and Consolidation Agreements) be reported under HMDA as refinancings?
Response: No. The guideline is unchanged: MECAs aren’t reportable as refinancings under Regulation C. See 67 Fed. Reg. 7221, 7227 (Feb. 15, 2002). The relevant remark had been unintentionally omitted whenever Commentary ended up being revised in 2002; the remark is supposed to be restored if the Commentary is next revised.
Temporary Financing. Whenever is that loan „temporary financing“ so that it is exempt from reporting?
Response: The regulation listings as samples of short-term funding construction loans and connection loans. See 203.4(d)(3). Bridge and construction loans are illustrative, perhaps maybe maybe not exclusive, types of short-term funding. The examples suggest that funding is short-term in case it is made to be replaced by permanent funding of a much long run. Financing is certainly not financing that is temporary because its term is brief. For instance, a loan provider will make that loan by having a 1-year term to allow an investor to buy a property, renovate it, and re-sell it before the term expires. Such that loan must certanly be reported being a true home purchase loan. See 203.2(h).
Reverse Mortgage—reporting. Does a lender need certainly to report informative data on applications and loans involving reverse mortgages?
Response: Reverse mortgages are susceptible to the basic guideline that loan providers must report applications or loans that meet up with the definition of a house purchase loan, do it yourself loan, or refinancing ( see 12 C.F.R. § 203.2(g)-(h), (k)).
Note, but, that reporting is optional in the event that reverse mortgage (in addition to qualifying as a true house purchase loan, do it yourself loan, or refinancing) can be a property equity credit line (HELOC). See 12 C.F.R. § 203.4(c)(3). The staff that is official to Regulation C states that a lender whom opts to report a HELOC should report within the loan quantity industry just the percentage of the line designed for do it yourself or house purchase. See remark 4(a)(7)-3.
Program—In basic. An element for the concept of „preapproval demand“ could be the existence of a „program. “ Just How could it be determined whether a scheduled system exists?
Solution: A preapproval system exists if the procedures used and established because of the loan provider match those specified in 203.2(b)(2). An application, aside from its title, just isn’t a „preapproval system“ for purposes of HMDA in the event that scheduled system doesn’t meet with the requirements within the regulation. A program may be a preapproval program for purposes of HMDA even though it is not so named by the same token. The real question is if the lender frequently makes use of the procedures specified within the legislation. Those requests need not be treated as requests for preapproval under HMDA if a lender has not established procedures like those specified in the regulation, but considers requests for preapproval on an ad hoc basis. Failure to determine and consistently follow consistent procedures, but, may raise fair-lending and safety-and-soundness issues.
Program—Commitment letter issued on demand. In cases where a loan provider problems a consignment page just in the applicant’s demand, does the financial institution have preapproval program?
Answer: then the lender has a preapproval program regardless whether the lender gives a written commitment to all applicants who qualify for preapproval or only to those qualifying applicants who specifically ask for a commitment in writing if a lender will as a general matter issue written commitments under the terms and procedures described in 203.2(b)(2.
Preapproval demand accepted and approved, but loan not originated. Exactly exactly How should a loan provider report a preapproval demand this has authorized where in actuality the debtor afterwards identified a residential property towards the loan provider but that loan wasn’t originated?